Religion based on logic, part 2

As my girlfriend pointed out yesterday, I didn´t finish with this topic. Well, I could go on for hours, but that would be a tedious reading, so Ill try to keep it short.

I ended last section with the notion that I wanna belive in a God, but that I don´t belive that people can act as the voice of God. And that is a problem, since all litterature we have is written by human hands, translated by human hands and interpeded by human minds. Therefore it would be really hard for me to accept and/or belive in any group-based religion.
Could it then be possible to belive in a God and still have a logic sence about it?
For me, it depends on what one says that God is. A logic reasoning for me, would be that God is energy, but with a mind, or a thinking. Since we know that energy never dissapers, that it only changes shape, that could be an answer to God.
Lets take a theoretical walk down the eons before man. The most accepted scientific answer to the creation of the universe is Big Bang. Where all energi and matter in the whole universe was collected in one point. For some reason it started expanding and eventually created the universe around us.

Where all this energy came from, noone knows. One popular idea is that there is a cyclic unverse, where an endless universes have come before, and endless more will come after. But one problem persists. There is, to my knowlegde, no answer to where it all begun

In the bible, it says that God existed before time. That he has no beginning and will have no end. This fits in rather well with the idea that Big Bang created time. Since time only exist to measure change, and when the universe was a singularity there was no change, there was no time. If God is the energi in this singularity, if God is the "universe" that would mean that he´s outside of time. He is a constant. He is the energy that is the basic of everything.

For me, this is not an impossibility. If there is a God, he/she is an it. It´s a "being" of pure energy. Almighty in its power.

Ill think Ill have to do a part 3 of this


Kommentarer

Kommentera inlägget här:

Namn:
Kom ihåg mig?

E-postadress: (publiceras ej)

URL/Bloggadress:

Kommentar:

Trackback
RSS 2.0